Skip to main content

Smoke doesn't always mean fire Part I

Smoke doesn't always mean fire Part III

Coming fresh off the heels of the LOR/UIF from Lt Col Martin, Tyler refocused his efforts on his civilian legal case and his ALS appeal.

His civilian case appeared to be on the verge of completion as Tyler was armed with a statement from his accuser recanting her initial statement. Her second statement cleared Tyler of any wrong doing. Moreover this information was made available to Lt Col Martin.

Great news right? Surely Lt Col Martin would rescind the LOR and UIF because Tyler is innocent! Not quite.

If you remember Lt Col Martin predicated 'getting rid' of the LOR and UIF on two conditions: that the charges off-base are dropped and the ALS appeal is granted. The flaw in this logic is quite obvious to most.

If Tyler did not commit the crime, and the charges are dropped, but for whatever reason ALS doesn't grant his appeal, keeping the LOR/UIF knowing he is innocent would add insult to injury. This of course is assuming that Tyler didn't commit the crime.

When Lt Col Martin learned that all of the charges were very likely to be dropped against Tyler he stated he believed Tyler had threatened the woman so she would change her story to 'get him off.' Lt Col Martin was so unwilling to admit he was wrong, he had to mitigate his cognitive dissonance and create a narrative where Tyler was still a dangerous criminal. All while going against every character statement and testimonial from his leadership. By this point AMU leadership had become more vocal in their support for Tyler, as now he was a much safer bet.

Oddly, Lt Col Martin did rescind the UIF but kept the LOR. His stated reason was so that when Tyler submitted his appeal there would not be an active UIF and the associated personnel code.

So at this point in the story, ask yourself: Does Lt Col Martin believe Tyler is innocent or guilty?

If he believes Tyler is innocent, the LOR should be rescinded

If he believes Tyler is guilty, he should have kept the UIF.

So which is it; innocent or guilty? It's like Schrodinger's punishment, Tyler is both guilty and not guilty simultaneously.

Nevertheless, Tyler continued his ALS appeal and eventually submitted it. I've included a few excerpts from his appeal below so you can read it for yourself:

Tyler submitted his appeal within the allotted time. First it went to MSgt Pilgrim for her to rebut Tyler's points. After a few days it traveled to the Barnes Center at Maxwell-Gunter AFB for review. Unlike my NCO Academy appeal, an ALS appeal is not reviewed by the commander at the Barnes Center. Rather it is reviewed by a representative. Likely a result of so many students in ALS, which results in quite a few more appeal applications.

A few weeks later Tyler received an email response from a MSgt at the Barnes Center. Unfortunately Tyler's appeal was denied. I was dumbfounded. Tyler was upset and confused. While we were both pretty biased, we believed the written appeal was very strong and based on the exact verbiage from the Barnes Center Instruction. The email concluded with the standard phrase 'if you have any questions please let me know'

Tyler replied to the email asking how the decision was reached and what recourse remained. Tyler CC'd me on the email as he did for most of his ALS correspondence. Oddly the MSgt called me and asked why 'This SrA Perkie keeps emailing me'

I explained that Tyler was just trying to understand how the Barnes Center reached the decision they did. The MSgt [sorry his name escapes me] said if Tyler had any questions he should ask his commander.

Now I was confused. Lt Col Martin wasn't at all involved in the ALS appeal, why would I ask him? The MSgt replied that 'we sought SrA Perkie's commander's input when deciding a on the appeal.'

Ah ha, now I understand. My guess is MSgt Pilgrims rebuttal to Tyler's appeal was flaccid, while Tyler's appeal was compelling. The Barnes Center reached out to Holloman to understand what happened. With Lt Col Martin convinced Tyler was not only a violent criminal, but had also threatened his accuser, he likely told the Barnes Center his twisted narrative as fact. The Barnes Center assumed the squadron commander had a handle on the situation and just did his bidding.

So I'd like to return to Lt Col Martin's conditions for rescinding the LOR. If Tyler is found innocent off base, and if his ALS appeal is granted.

A few days later the charges against Tyler were dropped by the Las Cruces District Attorney without prejudice. Meaning they could bring the charges against Tyler again in the future, however as of this writing they never did.

Lt Col Martin refused to remove the LOR.

By February 2016 Lt Col Martin was transitioning to be the Deputy Group Commander for the 54th Fighter Group. For a few months he had to dual hat being the group deputy and the AMXS commander.

Tyler kept his line number however because of the ALS disciplinary release he had to wait a full year to return to ALS before he could sew on SSgt.

While Tyler's career wasn't destroyed, it certainly took a major hit. All because Lt Col Martin refused to accept that he was wrong. At every opportunity Lt Col Martin could have accepted his mistake, and make it right; instead he elected to use every tool at his disposal to hamper and harass SrA Tyler Perkie. To me it became quite clear this had very little to do with the events of that night, and everything to do with a Lt Col Martin and his anger at Tyler for exercising his right to remain silent.

But karma can be a real bitch.. as you will soon see.


  1. Gahh! Chris your killing me with the cliff hangers! (Josh btw)


Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Air Force "Deep Dive" on Suicides Lands in the Shallow End

A year ago this week I wrote an article about what I believed was an impending and escalating suicide problem afflicting the Air Force. I was using my own military service, as well as information from my colleagues still serving, to piece together bits of information on suicides. In so doing I noticed a trend. But, before I get started a reminder: I am not an expert on mental health and nothing I say should be interpreted as medical advice.

As I wrote the article, more suicides were happening. I initially believed the issue was local to Holloman Air Force Base. However, as 2019 progressed it was clear this epidemic wasn't the exclusive domain of the 54th Fighter Group.

Prior to the Air Force announcing they had a suicide problem, I submitted a Freedom of Information Act[FOIA] request to the SecAF requesting all suicide metadata, to include Air Force Specialty Codes[AFSCs], or "job" data from 2009 to 2019. Three days after my request, the Air Force announced there was a …

So what's with the 7 levels?

I recently asked in a Facebook post what are some subjects you the readers wanted me to write about. I received quite a few great suggestions, but one stood out as a topic that I haven't quite addressed and I believe its time is due: inexperienced 7 levels. [I will apologize in advance, this one has quite a bit of acronyms.]

Before I dive into the topic I think it's important to explain my own journey to a 7 level, and it goes all the way back to MEPS. You see, like many aspiring Airmen I didn't know what job I would get when I joined the Air Force; I came in open mechanical. Which to me seemed strange, because mechanical was my lowest ASVAB score. My recruiter assured me that my score would allow me many mechanical jobs to pick from. I tried to explain that the ASVAB was an aptitude test, and I should be selected for a job that matched my highest category. He seemed apathetic, obviously meeting his quota was his motivator, not me aligning my career to my aptitude.

To say…

We failed to quantify quality Airmen

A couple weeks ago I wrote about a FOIA request I submitted in July 2019. The intent of the request was to bring clarity to the career fields impacted by the ongoing suicide epidemic in the Air Force. If you remember, the response was flaccid.

I went on to show how the current AF/A1 Lt. Gen. Brian Kelly was dishonest when he gave an interview in 2015 suggesting that critical career fields were somehow shielded from the Force Reduction measures, colloquially called "The Air Force Hunger Games."

But to simply say certain career fields were cut is insufficient to explain how the cuts were determined and, moreover, which discriminators were used. And for that, we need to go back a ways...

In early 2011 the Air Force had transferred many SSgts and TSgts from fighter maintenance to heavy aircraft in an effort to shore up their issues in the heavy world. In effect, robbing Peter to pay Paul. This left us with a slightly lopsided organization: thick in the SNCO ranks, thin in the mi…